What really happened the 11th September 2001?
Can we trust the story Bush is telling us about 11th September 2001? Is his story a conspiration theory? A story trying to blame Osama bin-Laden. Did Bush know what was going to happen that day? Was it due to knowing what was going to happen he let the children go on reading about a goat having heard someone whispering in his ear:
AMERICA IS UNDER ATTACK!
What also can make you suspicious is PNAC - Project for a New American Century with Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz writing in September 2000 that something was needed:
"some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor"
The japanese attack against Pearl Harbor president Roosevelt knew about in advance but he let it happen to get the population to support his wish to join the second world war.
The 11th September 2001 before going to bed Bush wrote in his diary:
"The Pearl Harbor of the 21st century took place today."
Muhammed Atta and his gang were known already in 2000. Able Danger a computer program had found them and understood their intentions. But Bush´s men had all the data erased and the ones collecting information had to stop looking for Atta or they would be fired.
Can we ourselves find out if Bush story is true?
You can search on Google.
To find out what can raise your suspicions in Bush story.
Have you seen Michael Moores movie Fahrenheit 9/11 you were told that Bush visited a school that day. You can see him sitting listening to some pupils reading a tale about a goat and someone whispers in his ear: "America is under attack".
And you can see his reaction.
Bush did not try run for safety. Possible the next plane was aiming at the school. The presidents car was waiting outside - shell proof. Why did he not run to the car?
The car was fully equipped to make him contact the airforce to give an order to bring down the plane now on its way to Pentagon.
Bush did not rise up - he just let the children go on reading the goat-tale. He left the school half an hour later after holding a speech. DO YOU NOT GET SUSPICOUS REALIZING THIS?
This is not the way you expect a president to behave.
BUT perhaps Bush knew what was going to happen? If so you will understand why he did not run for safety and why he did not tried to stop what was on its way.
If you want to know search for what New York Times has written about Bush you can search in this way:
bush site:www.nytimes.com
You can have a try yourself. You will get about 122000 hits.
Do you want to know how many times you can find Bush in Washington Post you can Google like this:
bush site:www.washingtonpost.com
You will get about 277000 hits.
Do you want to know what is written about Bush and Fahrenheit 9/11 in New York Times you have to use quotation marks to get Goole to understand that the movies title is composed of several parts. And it will look like this:
"fahrenheit 9/11" bush site:www.nytimes.com
You will get about 200 hits. This one looks interesting:
In a scene from "Fahrenheit 9/11," President Bush after being told "America is under attack"
The chosen page looks like this:
What thoughts and emotions are there inside his head after having heard:
"America is under attack!"
Why does he not look frighten and nervous wondering if there are more planes up in the air. And perhaps some plane coming for the school? And does he look like if he is wondering better run to the car - the shell proof one? And is he wondering what do we have to do? What have I to do to stop the attacks - better run to the car and get some more information - how many planes are hijacked? And I better have to contact the air force to get them do something bringing down perhaps more hijacked planes?
No - nothing of this it seems to. He lets the children go on reading the goat-tale.
Does not this tell you something? He knew!
What did Bush do the rest of that day?
Have you got suspicions - you want to know more.
There is a timeline you can search on:
www.cooperativeresearch.org
This site you can trust. Everything here is researched. It shall not be possible to find something being incorrect here. This is the most important source to search on to get to know something valuable about what really happened the 11th September 2001.
You can enter - bush 9/11 - to find out more:
You will get a lot to read. Why not find out what happened then the president took of with Air Force One to continue his trip this day.
Instead of searching you can have a look on the compilations on Cooperative Research.
Go to the first page:
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/
and click on the Complete 911 Timeline
And you can scroll down to Day of 9/11 and click:
All day of 9/11 events(401)
There are 401 events to have a closer look at.
To get to know what happened then Bush and Air Force One took of you have to click next 100 twice.
9:56 Air Force One took off. What makes you suspicious is the lack of protection. No fighters to protect his aircraft. There are 3 250 planes still in the air. The fighters will meet up with Air Force One about an hour later.
Why no fighters needed to protect the president?
Rumsfeld - what was his day like?
At 9:37 Pentagon was hit. Rumsfeld first story - he left Pentagon to go out and help the wounded.
Then he testifies before the 9/11 Commission - he tells them that he was not outside Pentagon for long just to determine what had happened. And then back inside to a crisis action team.
What Rumsfeld was doing before and after the attack on Pentagon is hard to know - probably he was in a video conference. He is missing for half an hour - no knows what he was doing - then he enters the National Military Command Center - NMCC.
Twenty minutes before three in the afternoon - he knows who to blame - it was Iraq with Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden. Due to CBS news he says:
"Go massive. Sweep it all up. Things related and not"
Three o´clock there is a video conference. Bush is sitting in the Offutt Air Base. Rumsfeld in Pentagon and Cheney in the White House.
CIA director Tenet claims that al-Qaeda is clearly behind the 9/11 attacks.
Cheney - what was his part?
May 8, 2001, he becomes the head of the new Office of National Preparedness to coordinate the programs responding to domestic attacks. He tells the press that the focus is on state-funded terrorists overseas using weapons of mass destruction. Neither bin Laden nor al-Qaeda is mentioned.
Cheney is told around 9:24 that radar is tracking Flight 77 - supposed to be hijacked.
He is in the Presidential Emergency Operations Center a bunker near the White House.
Transport secretary Mineta was before the 9-11 Commission - www.9-11commission.gov - to give his testimony about what happened the White House bunker.
Mineta and the 9/11 Commissions has different opinions on what time Cheney arrived to the bunker. Mineta says Cheney was there 9:20 but the Commission claims Cheney arrived just before 10:00.
It is about the order to shoot down Flight 93 - was it Cheney who ordered it taking the decision himself or had he asked the president for permission first.
www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20050724164122860
Minetas testimony can get you to believe Cheney was conducting the attacks:
..during the time that the airplane was coming into the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President, “The plane is 50 miles out.” “The plane is 30 miles out.” And when it got down to “the plane is 10 miles out,” the young man also said to the Vice President, “Do the orders still stand?” And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said, “Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?” Well at the time, I didn’t know what all of that meant.
In Wikipedia you can find a lot of information - let us use it to get the timetable for the attacks.
Flight 11
7:59 takes off - 8:14 hijacking - 8:25 confirmed - 8:46 hits WTC1 (North Tower) collapsing 10:28
Flight 175
8:14 takes off - 8:45 hijacking - 8:52 confirmed - 9:03 hits WTC2 (South Tower) collapsing 9:59
Flight 77
8:20 takes off - 8:59 hijacking - 8:59 confirmed - 9:37 hits Pentagon
Flight 93
8:47 takes off - 9:28 hijacking - 9:28 confirmed - sometime between 10:03 and 10:10 crashes into an field
What makes you suspicious is that NORAD did not sent any planes to get something done.
They got a lot of time to act!
Searching on NORAD on Cooperative Research you will discover that they earlier has had exercises about hijackings some of them - simulations of terrorists airborne terrorists attacks into buildings.
2000 the army intelligence program Able Danger had localised Mohammed Atta and some of his gang
but the investigators had to destroy all the data and stop gathering information about Atta or they would be fired. See Cooperative Research: Able Danger program
11th September 2001 there were a lot of exercises going on. Was the intention of those exercises to get the civilian air control confused also NORAD was confused.
www.911truth.org is a civil rights organisation trying to find out the truth.
A Review of the New Wargames Timeline - Nicholas Levis
The review is about the many suspicious exercises taking part 911. The article references to the på Cooperative Research timeline and to the book of Michael Rupperts: Crossing the Rubicon. Michael Ruppert was one of the first bring forth suspicions - accusing Cheney to have led the attacks. Here is his website: FromTheWilderness.
911truth.org has got links to videos with speakers from different gatherings.
Here - truthemergency.us/pages/VideoAudio.html - you can find a speech of David Ray Griffin who is the author to:
The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11
and
The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions
Paul Thompson started Cooperative Research.
What happened to World Trade Center number 7?
WTC 7 collapses 5:20 in the afternoon.
WTC 7 47 stories - 174 meters - so not an insignificant building.
WTC 7 not hit by a plane and not of falling debris making it collapse - some small fires going on.
How can this be? 2 airplanes - but 3 building?
The collapse of WTC 7 has got many suspicious.
Wikipedia does not know how to describe what happened.
Visit wtc7.net and you can find more information. The building was not hit of any airplane and not of debris making it collapse - some small fires inside - but not significant. Still it went down about five pm. And it went down very nice - just like a controlled demolition. If you want to compare go to www.controlled-demolition.com to have a look.
An Emergency Command Center
There are suspicions that the command center was used to remote control the two planes hitting WTC 1 and WTC 2 - and then collapsing WTC 7 after having evacuated it.
Larry Silverstein - having leased the WTC complex three months prior tells us this on a video:
I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.
"to pull" is to demolish a building
Have a look and listen to a video with Larry Silverstein
Here - 911research.wtc7.net - you can find out more about WTC 7.
And here: whatreallyhappened.com/wtc7.html
Morgan Reynolds
lewrockwell.com/reynolds/reynolds-arch.html
serendipity.li/wot/reynolds.htm
A former Bush team member during his first administration is now - June 2005 - voicing serious doubts about the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9-11.
Former chief economist for the Department of Labour during President George W. Bush's first term Morgan Reynolds comments that the official story about the collapse of the WTC is "bogus" and that it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7.
Reynolds, who also served as director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis in Dallas and is now professor emeritus at Texas A&M University said:
"The government's collapse theory is highly vulnerable on its own terms. Only professional demolition appears to account for the full range of facts associated with the collapse of the three buildings."
"If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an 'inside job' and a government attack on America would be compelling."
Have a look and listen to the fire fighters describing their experiences
Have a look on a page
showing the remaings of Madrid Windsor Building 108 meters in Februrary 2005 burning for 18 hours - but still standing - not collapsing.
Follow a link to look and listen to a video
The WCT construction manager describing the construction
The Anthrax
First you were told by media it was coming from Iraq and Saddam. This not being true - media silenced.
Letters were sent to the senators - Leahy och Daschle - the ones opposing t the Patriot Act - the new legislation taking your freedom away - to prevent terrorism!
And there is a link on whatreallyhappened.com to Washinton Post telling you the Anthrax was made in USA.
whatreallyhappened. com has got information about
The Five Dancing Israelis Arrested On 9/11
Rumsfeld and you will get this information:
They both belong to the same organization - PNAC - there are more well known names like Wolfowitz and Perle also belonging to this organization.
Enter PNAC for a search and you will find they have written a policy document advocating total global military domination.
Clicking Rebuilding America's Defences you will get this document:
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf
And you can read:
Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is
likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.
This document published in September 2000 tells you:
some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor
there can be some catastrophic event coming. And this catastrophic event will have a catalyzing effect. To catalyze is to "bring about, inspire". Bring about what? Inspire what? "a new Pearl Harbor"
Pearl Harbor was the way Roosevelt got USA into the second world war
Most Americans wanted to stay outside the war. Why go to Europe and fight. Let them fight their wars themselves. But Roosevelt wanted USA to take part in the war.
Cooperative Research searching on PNAC you will find out the name of the founder - Kristol publisher of Weekly Standard. And you can get to know that already 1998 PNAC wanted to get rid of Saddam Hussein because he was the threatening the worlds´s supply of oil.
And you can read about the document Rebuilding America´s Defenses from September 2000.
Before going to bed the 11th september 2001 Bush wrote in his diary due to Washington Post:
"The Pearl Harbor of the 21st century took place today."
Scroll to the bottom of the PNAC-serch page and you can find out that James Woolsey in April 2003 told the world - you too? - that the fourth world war had begun.
PNAC - Project for a New American Century - is a neoconservative "thinktank".
The ideas of Leo Strauss are the ideas behind those neoconservatives thinkers thoughts and the ones coming from PNAC.
Wikipedia gives you some clues to how this mans impact.
Scrolling down a bit you learn that Wolfowitz is the brain connecting Strauss, Neo-Conservatism and the directions of the American regime itself.
The homepage of Leo Strauss tells you that the philosopher who transcends of moral and politics has to answer the question:
"Why philosophy?"
To be able to answer the question you have consider the natural aim of man - happiness - and because man is a political being the question must be answered within a political framework.
Really clever guy that one! Knowing the natural aim for all of us and our true nature - politics...
Just his thoughts or he has got the proofs, too?
There are the ones regarding his philosophy is just about learning how to fool others.
alternet.org/story/15935/
and you can find the article - Leo Strauss' Philosophy of Deception
Cooperative Research and you can enter Wolfowitz to get a timeline for his doings. In April 2001 Wolfowitz and Richard Clarke had a quarrel. Wolfowitz tried to connect Iraq to terrorism. But Clarke did not agree. It hasn´t been any Iraq terrorism for 8 years.
Cooperative Research tells you this about Rickard Clarke:
May 22, 1998: Clinton Creates Counterterrorism Post, Selects Richard Clarke
President Clinton creates the new post of National Coordinator for Counterterrorism. He names Richard Clarke for the job, and Clarke soon becomes known as the counterterrorism “tsar.” [Washington Post, 4/20/00] This is outlined in a new presidential directive on counterterrorism that also outlines goals of fighting terrorism and attempts to strengthen interagency coordination of counterterrorism efforts.
There are many prominent members in PNAC - this guy Zalmay Khalizad is a member in PNAC. He has helped Wolfowitz to write a plan for world domination. He has also conducted risk analysis for a pipeline Turkmenistan - Afghanistan - Pakistan. The "real president" of Afghanistan he has been called.
All the time Wolfowitz tries to get a story - connecting Iraq with terrorism. Wolfowitz has read Leo Strauss. And he has understood that you have to have a trustworthy story to deceive the masses - common people - the ones outside the locked doors to the conference rooms - to get them believe in the goals of the wars of the door lockers.
To Wolfowitz and PNAC it is about total global military control - world domination.
You can ask yourself. What interests are behind PNAC? How to search for it?
Ask yourself - Who benefits? And for many people having no ideals like - love, peace and understanding - for those money is king - so follow the money! But there to begin searching?
archive.org/details/MoneyMasters
Here you can for free have a look and listen to a part of - The Money Masters: How International Bankers Gained Control Of America.
themoneymasters.com
Here you can buy it - Our new 2-volume, 3 1/2 hour, fast-paced, non-fiction, historical documentary video throws back the veil of deceit hiding the origins and operations of the corrupt banking plutocracy that owns and rules America, and is gradually and clandestinely imposing a worldwide tyranny on the rest of mankind.
Having seen the video - the Money Masters - perhaps you will get interested in Federal Reserve.
Most people know that the Federal Reserve Bank is creating the US dollars. But the truth is that the Federal Reserve is not federal at all, but owned by twelve super-wealthy International Banking families, such as the Rothschild’s and the Rockefellers.
And you can search for the owners.
And get diagrams to see the connections.
And you can search for the history of the bank.
And find a lot of interesting reading.
apfn.org/apfn/reserve.htm
The Creature from Jekyll Island: A Lecture on the Federal Reserve
"G. Edward Griffin exposes the most blatant scam of all history. It’s all here: the cause of wars, boom-bust cycles, inflation, depression, prosperity. It's just exactly what every American needs to know about the power of the central bank."
CHAPTER ONE Jekyll Island
On the night of November 22, 1910, a group of newspaper reporters stood disconsolately in the railway station at Hoboken, New Jersey. They had just watched a delegation of the nation’s leading financiers leave the station on a secret mission. It would be years before they discovered what that mission was, and even then they would not understand that the history of the United States underwent a drastic change after that night in Hoboken.
The delegation had left in a sealed railway car, with blinds drawn, for an undisclosed destination. They were led by Senator Nelson Aldrich, head of the National Monetary Commission. President Theodore Roosevelt had signed into law the bill creating the National Monetary Commission in 1908, after the tragic Panic of 1907 had resulted in a public outcry that the nation’s monetary system be stabilized. Aldrich had led the members of the Commission on a two-year tour of Europe, spending some three hundred thousand dollars of public money. He had not yet made a report on the results of this trip, nor had he offered any plan for banking reform.
Accompanying Senator Aldrich at the Hoboken station were his private secretary, Shelton; A. Piatt Andrew, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, and Special Assistant of the National Monetary Commission; Frank Vanderlip, president of the National City Bank of New York, Henry P. Davison, senior partner of J.P. Morgan Company, and generally regarded as Morgan’s personal emissary; and Charles D. Norton, president of the Morgan-dominated First National Bank of New York. Joining the group just before the train left the station were Benjamin Strong, also known as a lieutenant of J.P. Morgan; and Paul Warburg, a recent immigrant from Germany who had joined the banking house of Kuhn, Loeb
And you can search and find connections to the president John F Kennedy assassination.
What JFK did was to create interest-free government money, backed up by the silver reserve, contrary to the Federal Reserve money, which is not backed up by anything as we will see. He wanted to pay off the US debt this way. He obviously knew the secret about the Federal Reserve, and decided to follow the Constitution. Of course, this was a very dangerous thing to do, because if he was allowed to continue, it could put the International bankers out of business in the long run. So this was even more serious than to reorganize the CIA. Interestingly, soon after the assassination the interest-free money was taken out of circulation.
Kennedy signed a not very well known Executive Order, no 11110 in June of 1963, four months before the assassination. This Order returned to the Government the power to issue currency, without going through the Federal Reserve Bank.
And you can have a look on today´s debts - the total and the one to Federal Reserve.
Searching on this - you will learn how banking and war is connected.
Video with - Eisenhower´s Farewell Address to the Nation - January 17, 1961
informationclearinghouse.info/article5407.htm
Good evening, my fellow Americans: First, I should like to express my gratitude to the radio and television networks for the opportunity they have given me over the years to bring reports and messages to our nation. My special thanks go to them for the opportunity of addressing you this evening.
...
This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence – economic, political, even spiritual – is felt in every city, every Statehouse, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.
...
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.
...
We pray that peoples of all faiths, all races, all nations, may have their great human needs satisfied; that those now denied opportunity shall come to enjoy it to the full; that all who yearn for freedom may experience its spiritual blessings; that those who have freedom will understand, also, its heavy responsibilities; that all who are insensitive to the needs of others will learn charity; that the scourges of poverty, disease and ignorance will be made to disappear from the earth, and that, in the goodness of time, all peoples will come to live together in a peace guaranteed by the binding force of mutual respect and love.
Now, on Friday noon, I am to become a private citizen. I am proud to do so. I look forward to it.
Thank you, and good night.
Economy, war it is about natural resources. It is about energy. It is about oil. And oil has been a dominant reason to conflicts in the 19th century. Wikipedia can ell you more - tell you about the Sykes-Picot agreement. The first world war was a war about oil - and it has continued.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sykes-Picot_Agreement
all those categories in some way or another connected to oil and this agreement
And it is not only the first world war being a war about oil.
The second World War was also about oil:
www.azer.com/aiweb/categories/magazine/32_folder/32_articles/32_ww22.html
Hitler's mind was set to capture Baku's oil. Even the date of attack was scheduled (September 25, 1942). Anticipating a forthcoming victory, Hitler's generals presented him with a cake of the region-Baku and the Caspian Sea. Delighted, Hitler chose the best piece for himself-Baku.
Hitler was determined to capture the oil fields of the Caucasus including those in Maikop (Russia) and Grozny (Chechnya). But most of all, he wanted Baku. Hitler was obsessed with oil. He read about it, talked about it, and knew the history of the world's major oil fields. If he captured the oil of the Caucasus-along with the 'black earth,' farmlands of the Ukraine, he was convinced that the German empire's New Order would be self-sufficient within its own borders and thus invulnerable. (Yergin, 334).
The operational plan given to Hitler's assault in the Caucasus was "Edelweiss" (the name of the tiny white flower which grew on alpine mountainous slopes). To reach Baku, the German Führer would have to cross the Great Caucasus Range and thus the symbolism.
It's interesting to note that, originally, the German leaders had no plans to bomb Baku. Hitler's objective was not to destroy the oilfields but to be able to utilize them for his own troops.
And the third World War starting after the second World War going on to the fall of the Soviet Union 1991 was also about oil. 1956 was the year of the Suez War.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1956_Suez_War
The importance of the Canal was clear during both World Wars. During the first, it was closed to non-Allied shipping by the British and French. During the Second World War, it was tenaciously defended during the North African Campaign.
Daniel Yergin, a historian of the oil industry, has written:
[I]n 1948, the canal abruptly lost its traditional rationale. For in that year India became independent, and control over the canal could no longer be preserved on grounds that it was critical to the defense either of India or of an empire that was being liquidated. And yet, at exactly the same moment, the canal was gaining a new role — as the highway not of empire, but of oil.
Also the Vietnam war was a war about oil:
www.new-enlightenment.com/impintro1.htm
In 1945, Vietnam was still a colony of the French. Laurence Rockefeller, it appears, had given the extensive store of weapons to Ho Chi Minh with the hope that Vietnam would drive out the French so that Standard Oil would be able to take over the as yet undeveloped offshore fields. In 1954, Vietnamese General Giap finally defeated and drove out the French at Dien Bien Phu with weaponry provided by the U.S. However, Ho Chi Minh reneged on the deal since he could read too, and he was well aware of the Hoover resource report and knew there was a vast supply of oil off the Vietnamese coast.
In the 1950's a method of undersea oil exploration was perfected which used small explosions deep in the water and then recorded the sound echoes bouncing off the various layers of rock below. The surveyor could then determine the exact location of the arched salt domes which hold the accumulated oil beneath them. But if this method were used off the Vietnam coast on property Standard didn't own or have the rights to, the Vietnamese, the Chinese, the Japanese and probably even the French would quickly run to the United Nations and complain that America was stealing the oil, and that would shut down the operation.
In 1964, after Vietnam was divided into North and South, and the contrived Gulf of Tonkin incident, several U.S. aircraft carriers were stationed offshore of Vietnam and the 'war' was started. Every day jet planes would take off from the carriers, bomb locations in North and South Vietnam, and then using normal military procedure when returning would dump their unsafe or unused bombs in the ocean before landing back on the carriers. Safe ordnance drop zones were designated for this purpose away from the carriers.
Even close-up observers would only notice many small explosions occurring daily in the waters of the South China Sea and thought it was only part of the 'war.' The U.S. Navy carriers had begun Operation Linebacker One, and Standard Oil had begun its ten year oil survey of the seabed off of Vietnam. And the Vietnamese, Chinese and everybody else around, including the Americans, were none the wiser. The oil survey hardly cost Standard Oil a nickel, the U.S. taxpayers paid for it."
Marshall Douglas Smith. (2001). Black Gold Hot Gold, Ch. 3
So twenty years later and 57,000 Americans and half a million Vietnamese dead, Standard Oil had enough data and the war in Vietnam could end. Nelson Rockefeller's personal assistant, Henry Kissinger, represented the U.S. at the Vietnam/Paris Peace talks and won a Nobel Peace Prize in the bargain.
After the dust had settled from the war, Vietnam divided their offshore coastal area into numerous oil lots and allowed foreign companies to bid on the lots, with the proviso that Vietnam got a percentage of the action. Norway's Statoil, British Petroleum, Royal Dutch Shell, Russia, Germany and Australia all won bids and began drilling within their areas. Strange it was that none of them struck oil. However, the lots which Standard Oil bid for and won proved to have vast oil reserves. Their extensive undersea seismic research appears to have paid off.
The fourth World War started the 11 september 2001 due to PNAC - Project for a New American Century and Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Kristol, Perle, Podhoretz and a lot of others persons.
www.commentarymagazine.com/podhoretz.htm
Norman Podhoretz September 2004
World War IV: How It Started, What It Means, and Why We Have to Win
And the fourth World War is still about oil and money:
www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CLA410A.html
Why not search for some statistics?
Are there someones fighting against this?
At - www.truthout.org- you can get to know what is happening - learn to know the ones who want something else - a peaceful world - an end to the power of the ones trying to build an world empire with "total global military dominance".
You can find the same material here:
01september11.blogspot.com
if you find this address easier to remember
AMERICA IS UNDER ATTACK!
What also can make you suspicious is PNAC - Project for a New American Century with Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz writing in September 2000 that something was needed:
"some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor"
The japanese attack against Pearl Harbor president Roosevelt knew about in advance but he let it happen to get the population to support his wish to join the second world war.
The 11th September 2001 before going to bed Bush wrote in his diary:
"The Pearl Harbor of the 21st century took place today."
Muhammed Atta and his gang were known already in 2000. Able Danger a computer program had found them and understood their intentions. But Bush´s men had all the data erased and the ones collecting information had to stop looking for Atta or they would be fired.
Can we ourselves find out if Bush story is true?
You can search on Google.
To find out what can raise your suspicions in Bush story.
Have you seen Michael Moores movie Fahrenheit 9/11 you were told that Bush visited a school that day. You can see him sitting listening to some pupils reading a tale about a goat and someone whispers in his ear: "America is under attack".
And you can see his reaction.
Bush did not try run for safety. Possible the next plane was aiming at the school. The presidents car was waiting outside - shell proof. Why did he not run to the car?
The car was fully equipped to make him contact the airforce to give an order to bring down the plane now on its way to Pentagon.
Bush did not rise up - he just let the children go on reading the goat-tale. He left the school half an hour later after holding a speech. DO YOU NOT GET SUSPICOUS REALIZING THIS?
This is not the way you expect a president to behave.
BUT perhaps Bush knew what was going to happen? If so you will understand why he did not run for safety and why he did not tried to stop what was on its way.
If you want to know search for what New York Times has written about Bush you can search in this way:
bush site:www.nytimes.com
You can have a try yourself. You will get about 122000 hits.
Do you want to know how many times you can find Bush in Washington Post you can Google like this:
bush site:www.washingtonpost.com
You will get about 277000 hits.
Do you want to know what is written about Bush and Fahrenheit 9/11 in New York Times you have to use quotation marks to get Goole to understand that the movies title is composed of several parts. And it will look like this:
"fahrenheit 9/11" bush site:www.nytimes.com
You will get about 200 hits. This one looks interesting:
In a scene from "Fahrenheit 9/11," President Bush after being told "America is under attack"
The chosen page looks like this:
What thoughts and emotions are there inside his head after having heard:
"America is under attack!"
Why does he not look frighten and nervous wondering if there are more planes up in the air. And perhaps some plane coming for the school? And does he look like if he is wondering better run to the car - the shell proof one? And is he wondering what do we have to do? What have I to do to stop the attacks - better run to the car and get some more information - how many planes are hijacked? And I better have to contact the air force to get them do something bringing down perhaps more hijacked planes?
No - nothing of this it seems to. He lets the children go on reading the goat-tale.
Does not this tell you something? He knew!
What did Bush do the rest of that day?
Have you got suspicions - you want to know more.
There is a timeline you can search on:
www.cooperativeresearch.org
This site you can trust. Everything here is researched. It shall not be possible to find something being incorrect here. This is the most important source to search on to get to know something valuable about what really happened the 11th September 2001.
You can enter - bush 9/11 - to find out more:
You will get a lot to read. Why not find out what happened then the president took of with Air Force One to continue his trip this day.
Instead of searching you can have a look on the compilations on Cooperative Research.
Go to the first page:
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/
and click on the Complete 911 Timeline
And you can scroll down to Day of 9/11 and click:
All day of 9/11 events(401)
There are 401 events to have a closer look at.
To get to know what happened then Bush and Air Force One took of you have to click next 100 twice.
9:56 Air Force One took off. What makes you suspicious is the lack of protection. No fighters to protect his aircraft. There are 3 250 planes still in the air. The fighters will meet up with Air Force One about an hour later.
Why no fighters needed to protect the president?
Rumsfeld - what was his day like?
At 9:37 Pentagon was hit. Rumsfeld first story - he left Pentagon to go out and help the wounded.
Then he testifies before the 9/11 Commission - he tells them that he was not outside Pentagon for long just to determine what had happened. And then back inside to a crisis action team.
What Rumsfeld was doing before and after the attack on Pentagon is hard to know - probably he was in a video conference. He is missing for half an hour - no knows what he was doing - then he enters the National Military Command Center - NMCC.
Twenty minutes before three in the afternoon - he knows who to blame - it was Iraq with Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden. Due to CBS news he says:
"Go massive. Sweep it all up. Things related and not"
Three o´clock there is a video conference. Bush is sitting in the Offutt Air Base. Rumsfeld in Pentagon and Cheney in the White House.
CIA director Tenet claims that al-Qaeda is clearly behind the 9/11 attacks.
Cheney - what was his part?
May 8, 2001, he becomes the head of the new Office of National Preparedness to coordinate the programs responding to domestic attacks. He tells the press that the focus is on state-funded terrorists overseas using weapons of mass destruction. Neither bin Laden nor al-Qaeda is mentioned.
Cheney is told around 9:24 that radar is tracking Flight 77 - supposed to be hijacked.
He is in the Presidential Emergency Operations Center a bunker near the White House.
Transport secretary Mineta was before the 9-11 Commission - www.9-11commission.gov - to give his testimony about what happened the White House bunker.
Mineta and the 9/11 Commissions has different opinions on what time Cheney arrived to the bunker. Mineta says Cheney was there 9:20 but the Commission claims Cheney arrived just before 10:00.
It is about the order to shoot down Flight 93 - was it Cheney who ordered it taking the decision himself or had he asked the president for permission first.
www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20050724164122860
The hearings of May 22-23, 2003 were the second public hearings of the Commission and the first to focus on the actual events the day of 9/11. Secretary Mineta recounted to the Commission his experience on the morning of 9/11 from the time he was notified of the first plane hitting the WTC, to his experience at the Presidential Emergency Operations Center (PEOC) along with Vice President Cheney and staff.
Unlike Rumsfeld who claimed to be "out of the loop", and Myers who was not disturbed from breakfast with Max Cleland, Mineta was able to provide a full account of his experience that morning. Mineta testified that he arrived at the PEOC at 9:20 a.m. and that Vice President Cheney was already present with his staff. The 9/11 Commission Report states that Cheney himself arrived at the PEOC at 9:58, a stunning 38 minute contradiction to Mineta's testimony.
Mineta's PEOC testimony was also edited out of the 9/11 Commission video archive.
Minetas testimony can get you to believe Cheney was conducting the attacks:
..during the time that the airplane was coming into the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President, “The plane is 50 miles out.” “The plane is 30 miles out.” And when it got down to “the plane is 10 miles out,” the young man also said to the Vice President, “Do the orders still stand?” And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said, “Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?” Well at the time, I didn’t know what all of that meant.
In Wikipedia you can find a lot of information - let us use it to get the timetable for the attacks.
Flight 11
7:59 takes off - 8:14 hijacking - 8:25 confirmed - 8:46 hits WTC1 (North Tower) collapsing 10:28
Flight 175
8:14 takes off - 8:45 hijacking - 8:52 confirmed - 9:03 hits WTC2 (South Tower) collapsing 9:59
Flight 77
8:20 takes off - 8:59 hijacking - 8:59 confirmed - 9:37 hits Pentagon
Flight 93
8:47 takes off - 9:28 hijacking - 9:28 confirmed - sometime between 10:03 and 10:10 crashes into an field
What makes you suspicious is that NORAD did not sent any planes to get something done.
They got a lot of time to act!
Searching on NORAD on Cooperative Research you will discover that they earlier has had exercises about hijackings some of them - simulations of terrorists airborne terrorists attacks into buildings.
2000 the army intelligence program Able Danger had localised Mohammed Atta and some of his gang
but the investigators had to destroy all the data and stop gathering information about Atta or they would be fired. See Cooperative Research: Able Danger program
11th September 2001 there were a lot of exercises going on. Was the intention of those exercises to get the civilian air control confused also NORAD was confused.
www.911truth.org is a civil rights organisation trying to find out the truth.
A Review of the New Wargames Timeline - Nicholas Levis
The review is about the many suspicious exercises taking part 911. The article references to the på Cooperative Research timeline and to the book of Michael Rupperts: Crossing the Rubicon. Michael Ruppert was one of the first bring forth suspicions - accusing Cheney to have led the attacks. Here is his website: FromTheWilderness.
911truth.org has got links to videos with speakers from different gatherings.
Here - truthemergency.us/pages/VideoAudio.html - you can find a speech of David Ray Griffin who is the author to:
The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11
and
The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions
Paul Thompson started Cooperative Research.
What happened to World Trade Center number 7?
WTC 7 collapses 5:20 in the afternoon.
WTC 7 47 stories - 174 meters - so not an insignificant building.
WTC 7 not hit by a plane and not of falling debris making it collapse - some small fires going on.
How can this be? 2 airplanes - but 3 building?
The collapse of WTC 7 has got many suspicious.
Wikipedia does not know how to describe what happened.
Visit wtc7.net and you can find more information. The building was not hit of any airplane and not of debris making it collapse - some small fires inside - but not significant. Still it went down about five pm. And it went down very nice - just like a controlled demolition. If you want to compare go to www.controlled-demolition.com to have a look.
An Emergency Command Center
The 23rd floor of Building 7 had received 15 million dollars' worth of renovations to create an emergency command center for then-Mayor Rudolf Giuliani. The features of the command center include:
- Bullet- and bomb-resistant windows
- An independent, secure air and water supply
- The ability to withstand winds of 160 mph
There are suspicions that the command center was used to remote control the two planes hitting WTC 1 and WTC 2 - and then collapsing WTC 7 after having evacuated it.
Larry Silverstein - having leased the WTC complex three months prior tells us this on a video:
I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.
"to pull" is to demolish a building
Have a look and listen to a video with Larry Silverstein
Here - 911research.wtc7.net - you can find out more about WTC 7.
And here: whatreallyhappened.com/wtc7.html
Morgan Reynolds
lewrockwell.com/reynolds/reynolds-arch.html
serendipity.li/wot/reynolds.htm
A former Bush team member during his first administration is now - June 2005 - voicing serious doubts about the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9-11.
Former chief economist for the Department of Labour during President George W. Bush's first term Morgan Reynolds comments that the official story about the collapse of the WTC is "bogus" and that it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7.
Reynolds, who also served as director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis in Dallas and is now professor emeritus at Texas A&M University said:
"The government's collapse theory is highly vulnerable on its own terms. Only professional demolition appears to account for the full range of facts associated with the collapse of the three buildings."
"If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an 'inside job' and a government attack on America would be compelling."
The World Trade Center
complex came under the control of a private owner for the first time only in mid-2001, having been built and managed by the Port Authority as a public resource. The complex was leased to a partnership of Silverstein Properties and WestfieldAmerica.
The WTC complex had been losing money for years. Its the most valuable piece of real estate in the world, but the buildings themselves were a disaster. Under tenanted and beset by asbestos problems, the owner, the NY Port Authority had received warnings that it was sitting on a legal and financial time bomb.
On December 6, 2004 a federal jury decided that the two planes that crashed into the World Trade Center towers on September 11, 2001, were two separate attacks, entitling Larry Silverstein, the leaseholder, to approximately $2.2 billion from nine different insurance companies. Had the jury, in U.S. District Court in Manhattan, decided that the two planes constituted only a single attack, Silverstein would only have been paid half of that.
lewrockwell.com/reynolds/reynolds12.html
1. Each WTC building collapse occurred at virtually free-fall speed
2. Each building collapsed, for the most part, into its own footprint.
3. Virtually all the concrete (an estimated 100,000 tons in each tower) on every floor was pulverized into a very fine dust, a phenomenon that requires enormous energy and could not be caused by gravity alone
4. Dust exploded horizontally for a couple hundred feet, as did debris, at the beginning of each tower’s collapse.
5. Collapses were total, leaving none of the massive core columns sticking up hundreds of feet into the air.
6. Salvage experts were amazed at how small the debris stacks were.
7. The steel beams and columns came down in sections under 30 feet long and had no signs of "softening"; there was little left but shorn sections of steel and a few bits of concrete.
8. Photos and videos of the collapses all show "demolition waves," meaning "confluent rows of small explosions" along floors.
9. According to many witnesses, explosions occurred within the buildings.
10. Each collapse had detectable seismic vibrations suggestive of underground explosions, similar to the 2.3 earthquake magnitude from a demolition like the Seattle Kingdome
11. Each collapse produced molten steel identical to that generated by explosives, resulting in "hot spots" that persisted for months (the two hottest spots at WTC-2 and WTC-7 were approximately
1,350o F five days after being continuously flooded with water, a temperature high enough to melt aluminium
whatreallyhappened.com/9-11BasicQuestions
There are lots and lots of questions around what happened - questions still more or less unanswered.
Have a look and listen to the fire fighters describing their experiences
Have a look on a page
showing the remaings of Madrid Windsor Building 108 meters in Februrary 2005 burning for 18 hours - but still standing - not collapsing.
Follow a link to look and listen to a video
The WCT construction manager describing the construction
The Anthrax
First you were told by media it was coming from Iraq and Saddam. This not being true - media silenced.
Letters were sent to the senators - Leahy och Daschle - the ones opposing t the Patriot Act - the new legislation taking your freedom away - to prevent terrorism!
And there is a link on whatreallyhappened.com to Washinton Post telling you the Anthrax was made in USA.
whatreallyhappened. com has got information about
The Five Dancing Israelis Arrested On 9/11
A Mossad surveillance team made
quite a public spectacle of themselves on 9-11.
| The men set up cameras by the Hudson River and trained them on the twin towers. |
Police received several calls from angry New Jersey residents claiming “middle-eastern” men with a white van were videotaping the disaster with shouts of joy and mockery.
"They were like happy, you know … They didn't look shocked to me" said a witness.
| [T]hey were seen by New Jersey residents on Sept. 11 making fun of the World Trade Center ruins and going to extreme lengths to photograph themselves in front of the wreckage. |
Witnesses saw them jumping for joy in Liberty State Park after the initial impact. Later on, other witnesses saw them celebrating on a roof in Weehawken, and still more witnesses later saw them celebrating with high fives in a Jersey City parking lot.
"It looked like they're hooked in with this. It looked like they knew what was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park."
www.sourcewatch.org
is the site that gives you more information about persons involved.
Make a search on Cheney to get to know this:
Rumsfeld and you will get this information:
They both belong to the same organization - PNAC - there are more well known names like Wolfowitz and Perle also belonging to this organization.
Enter PNAC for a search and you will find they have written a policy document advocating total global military domination.
Clicking Rebuilding America's Defences you will get this document:
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf
And you can read:
Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is
likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.
This document published in September 2000 tells you:
some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor
there can be some catastrophic event coming. And this catastrophic event will have a catalyzing effect. To catalyze is to "bring about, inspire". Bring about what? Inspire what? "a new Pearl Harbor"
Pearl Harbor was the way Roosevelt got USA into the second world war
Most Americans wanted to stay outside the war. Why go to Europe and fight. Let them fight their wars themselves. But Roosevelt wanted USA to take part in the war.
Cooperative Research searching on PNAC you will find out the name of the founder - Kristol publisher of Weekly Standard. And you can get to know that already 1998 PNAC wanted to get rid of Saddam Hussein because he was the threatening the worlds´s supply of oil.
And you can read about the document Rebuilding America´s Defenses from September 2000.
Before going to bed the 11th september 2001 Bush wrote in his diary due to Washington Post:
"The Pearl Harbor of the 21st century took place today."
Scroll to the bottom of the PNAC-serch page and you can find out that James Woolsey in April 2003 told the world - you too? - that the fourth world war had begun.
PNAC - Project for a New American Century - is a neoconservative "thinktank".
The ideas of Leo Strauss are the ideas behind those neoconservatives thinkers thoughts and the ones coming from PNAC.
Wikipedia gives you some clues to how this mans impact.
Scrolling down a bit you learn that Wolfowitz is the brain connecting Strauss, Neo-Conservatism and the directions of the American regime itself.
The homepage of Leo Strauss tells you that the philosopher who transcends of moral and politics has to answer the question:
"Why philosophy?"
To be able to answer the question you have consider the natural aim of man - happiness - and because man is a political being the question must be answered within a political framework.
Really clever guy that one! Knowing the natural aim for all of us and our true nature - politics...
Just his thoughts or he has got the proofs, too?
There are the ones regarding his philosophy is just about learning how to fool others.
alternet.org/story/15935/
and you can find the article - Leo Strauss' Philosophy of Deception
Rule One: Deception
It's hardly surprising then why Strauss is so popular an administration obsessed with secrecy, especially when it comes to matters of foreign policy. Not only did Strauss have few qualms about using deception in politics, he saw it as a necessity.Second Principle: Power of Religion
According to Drury, Strauss had a "huge contempt" for secular democracy. Nazism, he believed, was a nihilistic reaction to the irreligious and liberal nature of the Weimar Republic. Among other neoconservatives, Irving Kristol has long argued for a much greater role for religion in the public sphere, even suggesting that the Founding Fathers of the American Republic made a major mistake by insisting on the separation of church and state. And why? Because Strauss viewed religion as absolutely essential in order to impose moral law on the masses who otherwise would be out of control.
At the same time, he stressed that religion was for the masses alone; the rulers need not be bound by it.Third Principle: Aggressive Nationalism
Like Thomas Hobbes, Strauss believed that the inherently aggressive nature of human beings could only be restrained by a powerful nationalistic state. "Because mankind is intrinsically wicked, he has to be governed," he once wrote. "Such governance can only be established, however, when men are united – and they can only be united against other people."
Not surprisingly, Strauss' attitude toward foreign policy was distinctly Machiavellian. "Strauss thinks that a political order can be stable only if it is united by an external threat," Drury wrote in her book. "Following Machiavelli, he maintained that if no external threat exists then one has to be manufactured (emphases added)."
Cooperative Research and you can enter Wolfowitz to get a timeline for his doings. In April 2001 Wolfowitz and Richard Clarke had a quarrel. Wolfowitz tried to connect Iraq to terrorism. But Clarke did not agree. It hasn´t been any Iraq terrorism for 8 years.
Cooperative Research tells you this about Rickard Clarke:
May 22, 1998: Clinton Creates Counterterrorism Post, Selects Richard Clarke
President Clinton creates the new post of National Coordinator for Counterterrorism. He names Richard Clarke for the job, and Clarke soon becomes known as the counterterrorism “tsar.” [Washington Post, 4/20/00] This is outlined in a new presidential directive on counterterrorism that also outlines goals of fighting terrorism and attempts to strengthen interagency coordination of counterterrorism efforts.
There are many prominent members in PNAC - this guy Zalmay Khalizad is a member in PNAC. He has helped Wolfowitz to write a plan for world domination. He has also conducted risk analysis for a pipeline Turkmenistan - Afghanistan - Pakistan. The "real president" of Afghanistan he has been called.
All the time Wolfowitz tries to get a story - connecting Iraq with terrorism. Wolfowitz has read Leo Strauss. And he has understood that you have to have a trustworthy story to deceive the masses - common people - the ones outside the locked doors to the conference rooms - to get them believe in the goals of the wars of the door lockers.
To Wolfowitz and PNAC it is about total global military control - world domination.
You can ask yourself. What interests are behind PNAC? How to search for it?
Ask yourself - Who benefits? And for many people having no ideals like - love, peace and understanding - for those money is king - so follow the money! But there to begin searching?
archive.org/details/MoneyMasters
Here you can for free have a look and listen to a part of - The Money Masters: How International Bankers Gained Control Of America.
themoneymasters.com
Here you can buy it - Our new 2-volume, 3 1/2 hour, fast-paced, non-fiction, historical documentary video throws back the veil of deceit hiding the origins and operations of the corrupt banking plutocracy that owns and rules America, and is gradually and clandestinely imposing a worldwide tyranny on the rest of mankind.
Having seen the video - the Money Masters - perhaps you will get interested in Federal Reserve.
Most people know that the Federal Reserve Bank is creating the US dollars. But the truth is that the Federal Reserve is not federal at all, but owned by twelve super-wealthy International Banking families, such as the Rothschild’s and the Rockefellers.
And you can search for the owners.
And get diagrams to see the connections.
And you can search for the history of the bank.
And find a lot of interesting reading.
apfn.org/apfn/reserve.htm
The Creature from Jekyll Island: A Lecture on the Federal Reserve
"G. Edward Griffin exposes the most blatant scam of all history. It’s all here: the cause of wars, boom-bust cycles, inflation, depression, prosperity. It's just exactly what every American needs to know about the power of the central bank."
CHAPTER ONE Jekyll Island
On the night of November 22, 1910, a group of newspaper reporters stood disconsolately in the railway station at Hoboken, New Jersey. They had just watched a delegation of the nation’s leading financiers leave the station on a secret mission. It would be years before they discovered what that mission was, and even then they would not understand that the history of the United States underwent a drastic change after that night in Hoboken.
The delegation had left in a sealed railway car, with blinds drawn, for an undisclosed destination. They were led by Senator Nelson Aldrich, head of the National Monetary Commission. President Theodore Roosevelt had signed into law the bill creating the National Monetary Commission in 1908, after the tragic Panic of 1907 had resulted in a public outcry that the nation’s monetary system be stabilized. Aldrich had led the members of the Commission on a two-year tour of Europe, spending some three hundred thousand dollars of public money. He had not yet made a report on the results of this trip, nor had he offered any plan for banking reform.
Accompanying Senator Aldrich at the Hoboken station were his private secretary, Shelton; A. Piatt Andrew, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, and Special Assistant of the National Monetary Commission; Frank Vanderlip, president of the National City Bank of New York, Henry P. Davison, senior partner of J.P. Morgan Company, and generally regarded as Morgan’s personal emissary; and Charles D. Norton, president of the Morgan-dominated First National Bank of New York. Joining the group just before the train left the station were Benjamin Strong, also known as a lieutenant of J.P. Morgan; and Paul Warburg, a recent immigrant from Germany who had joined the banking house of Kuhn, Loeb
And you can search and find connections to the president John F Kennedy assassination.
What JFK did was to create interest-free government money, backed up by the silver reserve, contrary to the Federal Reserve money, which is not backed up by anything as we will see. He wanted to pay off the US debt this way. He obviously knew the secret about the Federal Reserve, and decided to follow the Constitution. Of course, this was a very dangerous thing to do, because if he was allowed to continue, it could put the International bankers out of business in the long run. So this was even more serious than to reorganize the CIA. Interestingly, soon after the assassination the interest-free money was taken out of circulation.
Kennedy signed a not very well known Executive Order, no 11110 in June of 1963, four months before the assassination. This Order returned to the Government the power to issue currency, without going through the Federal Reserve Bank.
And you can have a look on today´s debts - the total and the one to Federal Reserve.
Searching on this - you will learn how banking and war is connected.
Video with - Eisenhower´s Farewell Address to the Nation - January 17, 1961
informationclearinghouse.info/article5407.htm
Good evening, my fellow Americans: First, I should like to express my gratitude to the radio and television networks for the opportunity they have given me over the years to bring reports and messages to our nation. My special thanks go to them for the opportunity of addressing you this evening.
...
This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence – economic, political, even spiritual – is felt in every city, every Statehouse, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.
...
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.
...
We pray that peoples of all faiths, all races, all nations, may have their great human needs satisfied; that those now denied opportunity shall come to enjoy it to the full; that all who yearn for freedom may experience its spiritual blessings; that those who have freedom will understand, also, its heavy responsibilities; that all who are insensitive to the needs of others will learn charity; that the scourges of poverty, disease and ignorance will be made to disappear from the earth, and that, in the goodness of time, all peoples will come to live together in a peace guaranteed by the binding force of mutual respect and love.
Now, on Friday noon, I am to become a private citizen. I am proud to do so. I look forward to it.
Thank you, and good night.
Economy, war it is about natural resources. It is about energy. It is about oil. And oil has been a dominant reason to conflicts in the 19th century. Wikipedia can ell you more - tell you about the Sykes-Picot agreement. The first world war was a war about oil - and it has continued.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sykes-Picot_Agreement
all those categories in some way or another connected to oil and this agreement
And it is not only the first world war being a war about oil.
The second World War was also about oil:
www.azer.com/aiweb/categories/magazine/32_folder/32_articles/32_ww22.html
Hitler's mind was set to capture Baku's oil. Even the date of attack was scheduled (September 25, 1942). Anticipating a forthcoming victory, Hitler's generals presented him with a cake of the region-Baku and the Caspian Sea. Delighted, Hitler chose the best piece for himself-Baku.
Hitler was determined to capture the oil fields of the Caucasus including those in Maikop (Russia) and Grozny (Chechnya). But most of all, he wanted Baku. Hitler was obsessed with oil. He read about it, talked about it, and knew the history of the world's major oil fields. If he captured the oil of the Caucasus-along with the 'black earth,' farmlands of the Ukraine, he was convinced that the German empire's New Order would be self-sufficient within its own borders and thus invulnerable. (Yergin, 334).
The operational plan given to Hitler's assault in the Caucasus was "Edelweiss" (the name of the tiny white flower which grew on alpine mountainous slopes). To reach Baku, the German Führer would have to cross the Great Caucasus Range and thus the symbolism.
It's interesting to note that, originally, the German leaders had no plans to bomb Baku. Hitler's objective was not to destroy the oilfields but to be able to utilize them for his own troops.
And the third World War starting after the second World War going on to the fall of the Soviet Union 1991 was also about oil. 1956 was the year of the Suez War.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1956_Suez_War
The importance of the Canal was clear during both World Wars. During the first, it was closed to non-Allied shipping by the British and French. During the Second World War, it was tenaciously defended during the North African Campaign.
Daniel Yergin, a historian of the oil industry, has written:
[I]n 1948, the canal abruptly lost its traditional rationale. For in that year India became independent, and control over the canal could no longer be preserved on grounds that it was critical to the defense either of India or of an empire that was being liquidated. And yet, at exactly the same moment, the canal was gaining a new role — as the highway not of empire, but of oil.
Also the Vietnam war was a war about oil:
www.new-enlightenment.com/impintro1.htm
In 1945, Vietnam was still a colony of the French. Laurence Rockefeller, it appears, had given the extensive store of weapons to Ho Chi Minh with the hope that Vietnam would drive out the French so that Standard Oil would be able to take over the as yet undeveloped offshore fields. In 1954, Vietnamese General Giap finally defeated and drove out the French at Dien Bien Phu with weaponry provided by the U.S. However, Ho Chi Minh reneged on the deal since he could read too, and he was well aware of the Hoover resource report and knew there was a vast supply of oil off the Vietnamese coast.
In the 1950's a method of undersea oil exploration was perfected which used small explosions deep in the water and then recorded the sound echoes bouncing off the various layers of rock below. The surveyor could then determine the exact location of the arched salt domes which hold the accumulated oil beneath them. But if this method were used off the Vietnam coast on property Standard didn't own or have the rights to, the Vietnamese, the Chinese, the Japanese and probably even the French would quickly run to the United Nations and complain that America was stealing the oil, and that would shut down the operation.
In 1964, after Vietnam was divided into North and South, and the contrived Gulf of Tonkin incident, several U.S. aircraft carriers were stationed offshore of Vietnam and the 'war' was started. Every day jet planes would take off from the carriers, bomb locations in North and South Vietnam, and then using normal military procedure when returning would dump their unsafe or unused bombs in the ocean before landing back on the carriers. Safe ordnance drop zones were designated for this purpose away from the carriers.
Even close-up observers would only notice many small explosions occurring daily in the waters of the South China Sea and thought it was only part of the 'war.' The U.S. Navy carriers had begun Operation Linebacker One, and Standard Oil had begun its ten year oil survey of the seabed off of Vietnam. And the Vietnamese, Chinese and everybody else around, including the Americans, were none the wiser. The oil survey hardly cost Standard Oil a nickel, the U.S. taxpayers paid for it."
Marshall Douglas Smith. (2001). Black Gold Hot Gold, Ch. 3
So twenty years later and 57,000 Americans and half a million Vietnamese dead, Standard Oil had enough data and the war in Vietnam could end. Nelson Rockefeller's personal assistant, Henry Kissinger, represented the U.S. at the Vietnam/Paris Peace talks and won a Nobel Peace Prize in the bargain.
After the dust had settled from the war, Vietnam divided their offshore coastal area into numerous oil lots and allowed foreign companies to bid on the lots, with the proviso that Vietnam got a percentage of the action. Norway's Statoil, British Petroleum, Royal Dutch Shell, Russia, Germany and Australia all won bids and began drilling within their areas. Strange it was that none of them struck oil. However, the lots which Standard Oil bid for and won proved to have vast oil reserves. Their extensive undersea seismic research appears to have paid off.
The fourth World War started the 11 september 2001 due to PNAC - Project for a New American Century and Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Kristol, Perle, Podhoretz and a lot of others persons.
www.commentarymagazine.com/podhoretz.htm
Norman Podhoretz September 2004
World War IV: How It Started, What It Means, and Why We Have to Win
And the fourth World War is still about oil and money:
www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CLA410A.html
Why not search for some statistics?
Oil consumption by and for each person
Country Barrels of oil per
person annuallyUnited States 23.4 Japan 14.0 Spain 13.8 Mexico 6.0 Brazil 3.5 China 1.5 India 0.8 • Source: Simmons & Company International.
Are there someones fighting against this?
At - www.truthout.org- you can get to know what is happening - learn to know the ones who want something else - a peaceful world - an end to the power of the ones trying to build an world empire with "total global military dominance".
You can find the same material here:
01september11.blogspot.com
if you find this address easier to remember
posted by 11september01 at 11:33 AM
